601. Underneath the Denmark-Russia BIT, as there isn't a restricting language, it is very apparent that its arbitration clause in Article 8 gives jurisdiction regarding the safety granted in Write-up 4 of that BIT for expropriation. Thus, via the MFN clause in Post three IPPA, the existing Tribunal does have jurisdiction in that regard also. 2. Att

4. The difficulty if the actions of Respondent have to be regarded as expropriations under the UK-Soviet BIT is transferred to the deserves section of this arbitration. Claimant, In contrast, was in the course of this complete period of time very little more than an uncompensated money intermediary, obligated to act (for no charge) exclusively p